SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW
Report of Executive Editor to SDS Policy Council (Feb. 2004) at MIT
1. Issue
19:4 will have been received by members 1-2 weeks ago.
2. Issue
20:1
This is filled -- 4 papers including a Research Problems paper. It will be published late February/early March. Three of the four papers have already been proofed.
Issue
20:2
This is a Special Issue on Environmental and Resource Issues, guest – edited by Andy Ford and
Bob Cavana. They report 5 good papers
in the final stages. Copy deadline is
March 23 for summer publication.
Issue
20:3
One paper already accepted and it is being held over
because of the Special
Issue and will be published on Early View.
3. Statistics
Since January 2003, 53 papers have been logged at this office. Of these 16 (30%) have been rejected, 16
are at the revision stage (although 6
of these amount to significant revisions or a complete recast), 14 are still at 1st Review; 3 have been accepted and published; 4 accepted and awaiting publication in
either 20:1 or 20:3. This analysis does
not include submissions to Special Issues.
4. Future
Prospects
A reasonably healthy situation. Managing editors report 9 papers likely to
be accepted with the next 3 – 6 months.
The Special Issue slated for 2005 (Dynamics of Supply Chains & Networks,
guest-edited by H. Akkermans & N. Dellaert) was heavily over-subscribed
following the Call for Papers last year.
The editors have whittled down the list and good abstracts have resulted
in their authors being encouraged to submit a full paper. This issue looks like it will appear on
schedule.
The Security Special Issue suggested by Jose
Gonzalez has been postponed for at least a year.
5. Location
for non-print material.
The Editors’ Meeting at the New York City conference
agreed that this material should be hosted at authors’ own sites. Accordingly hot links to the relevant sites
will be established from Wiley InterScience and their availability mentioned in
the printed paper – usually as a footnote or reference. Managing editors now routinely request
copies of models for reviewers.
6. Institutional
Subscriptions
In 2002 – 03 Wiley, with the help of the Home
Office, undertook a significant marketing exercise particularly directed at
higher education institutions that were thought promising as potential
subscribers. This revealed a small
number of sites which actually took S D
Review but were not recorded as such by Wiley!
Because institutions often subscribe via an agency,
it is not possible to state unambiguously whether a new subscription resulted
from the initiative or another cause.
However the number of Enhanced Licences (a common contract option for
institutions) are as follows:
End 2000 9
“ 2001 28
“ 2002 41
“ 2003 45
Overall individual membership
(including students) is:-
End 2000 779
“ 2001 842
“ 2002 884
“ 2003 952
Wiley comment that “the general pattern of growth
over the last 4 years looks fairly healthy”.
Wiley’s Graham Russell has provided spreadsheets
listing all the 2003 and 2004 institutional subscribers, although a number are
omitted from the 2004 list because their subscriptions have not yet reached
Wiley.
Brian
Dangerfield
February
2004.