Abstract for: Bridging Causal Loop Diagrams and Quantitative Simulation: A Data-Informed Framework for Estimating Latent Social Dynamics
| Introduction | Translating causal loop diagrams (CLDs) into empirically parameterized simulation models remains a challenge in system dynamics, particularly in socio-behavioral systems. In these systems, key variables are often latent, and available data are typically repeated cross-sectional rather than longitudinal. We develop a methodological framework to empirically calibrate quantitative system dynamics models that preserves CLD structure through the systematic integration of qualitative knowledge and cross-sectional data. |
| Approach | Our framework extends CLDs from qualitative representations of feedback structure to quantitative constraints within a discrete-time linear dynamical system. Sign and sparsity restrictions derived from the CLD restrict the admissible interaction matrix, while pathway strengths are estimated to jointly match time-varying patterns in repeated cross-sectional data and the covariance structure implied by the discrete Lyapunov equation. This formulation constitutes a constrained dynamical inference problem. |
| Results | We apply this framework to an HIV prevention case study using repeated cross-sectional data from the American Men’s Internet Survey. Early results show the approach generates trajectories consistent with population-level patterns while preserving CLD-derived feedback relationships. Estimated pathway strengths suggest geographic heterogeneity in latent dynamics and a consistent inhibitory effect of healthcare engagement on anticipated healthcare stigma. These results remain exploratory but align with patterns observed in the literature. |
| Discussion | Our findings suggest that constrained dynamical inference may offer a scalable methodological framework for translating qualitative CLDs into empirically informed dynamic models. Rather than specifying mechanistic equations a priori, it can infer latent relationships consistent with both data and feedback structure. In doing so, it enables analysis of socio-behavioral systems under uncertainty. Ongoing work focuses on validation, extension to nonlinear dynamics, and tangible applications to intervention and policy analysis. |