Quick Links | All Variables | Variable Link Detail | Variable Types | Views | Groups | Units | Macros | Feedback Loops | Loop List No IVV | Link Polarity | View Summary | View-Variable Profile |
Model Information | Result |
---|---|
Time Unit | |
Initial Time | |
Final Time | |
Reported Time Interval | |
Time Step | |
Model Is Fully Formulated | |
Model Defined Groups |
Warnings | Result |
---|---|
Potential Omissions | Result |
---|---|
L: Level (4 / 4)* | SM: Smooth (0 / 0)* | DE: Delay (0 / 0)*† | LI: Level Initial (0) | I: Initial (0 / 0) |
C: Constant (8 / 8) | F: Flow (5 / 5) | A: Auxiliary (24 / 24) | Sub: Subscripts (0) | D: Data (0 / 0) |
G: Game (0 / 0) | T: Lookup (6 / 6)*†† |
|
Estrangement Model FINAL (26) |
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Top | (All) Variables (30 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description | Estrangement Model FINAL | #1 A | Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #2 F,A | Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #3 F,A | Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2 [11,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #4 F,A | Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3 [8,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #5 A | Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) = Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1 [13,13] (-) 1 [13,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #7 A | Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) = Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2 [11,13] (-) 2 [11,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #9 A | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) = Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered) Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3 [8,13] (-) 2 [11,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #11 L | Communication (dmnl) = ∫Change in Communication dt + 1.0 Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1 [13,13] (-) 2 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #12 A | Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #13 A | Contradiction (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 1 [13,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #14 L | Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) = ∫Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0 Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #15 C | Days in a week (Days/Week) = 7 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #16 L | Estrangement (dmnl) = ∫Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
.Control | #17 C | FINAL TIME (Week) = 2607.14 Description: The final time for the simulation. Present In 0 Views: |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #18 C | Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) = 6 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
.Control | #19 C | INITIAL TIME (Week) = 0 Description: The initial time for the simulation. Present In 0 Views: |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #20 F,A | Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #21 A | Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #23 C | Normal Let Go Time (Week) = 2 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #24 C | Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = 0.1 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #25 A | Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #26 A | Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #28 A | Probability of Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [8,8] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #30 A | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 1 [11,11] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #32 F,A | Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
.Control | #33 A | SAVEPER (Week ) = TIME STEP Description: The frequency with which output is stored. Present In 0 Views: |
![]() |
.Control | #35 C | TIME STEP (Week ) = 1 Description: The time step for the simulation. Present In 0 Views:
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #36 A | Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #37 L | Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) = ∫Change in Trust dt + 1.0 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #38 C | Week (Week) = 1 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
(View) View 1 (26 Variables) |
![]() |
Top | (View) View 1 (26 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description | Estrangement Model FINAL | #1 A | Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #2 F,A | Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #3 F,A | Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2 [11,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #4 F,A | Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3 [8,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #5 A | Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) = Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1 [13,13] (-) 1 [13,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #7 A | Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) = Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2 [11,13] (-) 2 [11,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #9 A | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) = Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered) Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3 [8,13] (-) 2 [11,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #11 L | Communication (dmnl) = ∫Change in Communication dt + 1.0 Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1 [13,13] (-) 2 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #12 A | Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #13 A | Contradiction (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 1 [13,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #14 L | Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) = ∫Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0 Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #15 C | Days in a week (Days/Week) = 7 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #16 L | Estrangement (dmnl) = ∫Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #18 C | Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) = 6 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #20 F,A | Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #21 A | Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #23 C | Normal Let Go Time (Week) = 2 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #24 C | Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = 0.1 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #25 A | Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #26 A | Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #28 A | Probability of Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [8,8] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #30 A | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 1 [11,11] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #32 F,A | Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #36 A | Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #37 L | Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) = ∫Change in Trust dt + 1.0 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #38 C | Week (Week) = 1 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Top | (Group) Estrangement Model FINAL (26 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description | Estrangement Model FINAL | #1 A | Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #2 F,A | Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #3 F,A | Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2 [11,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #4 F,A | Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3 [8,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #5 A | Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) = Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1 [13,13] (-) 1 [13,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #7 A | Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) = Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2 [11,13] (-) 2 [11,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #9 A | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) = Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered) Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3 [8,13] (-) 2 [11,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #11 L | Communication (dmnl) = ∫Change in Communication dt + 1.0 Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1 [13,13] (-) 2 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #12 A | Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #13 A | Contradiction (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 1 [13,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #14 L | Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) = ∫Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0 Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #15 C | Days in a week (Days/Week) = 7 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #16 L | Estrangement (dmnl) = ∫Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #18 C | Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) = 6 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #20 F,A | Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #21 A | Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #23 C | Normal Let Go Time (Week) = 2 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #24 C | Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = 0.1 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #25 A | Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #26 A | Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #28 A | Probability of Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [8,8] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #30 A | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 1 [11,11] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #32 F,A | Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #36 A | Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #37 L | Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) = ∫Change in Trust dt + 1.0 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #38 C | Week (Week) = 1 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Top | (Type) Level (4 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description | Estrangement Model FINAL | #11 L | Communication (dmnl) = ∫Change in Communication dt + 1.0 Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1 [13,13] (-) 2 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #14 L | Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) = ∫Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0 Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #16 L | Estrangement (dmnl) = ∫Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #37 L | Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) = ∫Change in Trust dt + 1.0 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Top | (Type) Smooth (0 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description |
Top | (Type) Delay (0 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description |
Top | (Type) Level Initial (0 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description |
Top | (Type) Initial (0 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description |
Top | (Type) Constant (5 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description | Estrangement Model FINAL | #15 C | Days in a week (Days/Week) = 7 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #18 C | Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) = 6 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #23 C | Normal Let Go Time (Week) = 2 Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #24 C | Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = 0.1 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #38 C | Week (Week) = 1 Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Top | (Type) Flow (5 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description | Estrangement Model FINAL | #2 F,A | Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #3 F,A | Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2 [11,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #4 F,A | Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3 [8,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #20 F,A | Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #32 F,A | Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Top | (Type) Auxiliary (17 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description | Estrangement Model FINAL | #1 A | Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #2 F,A | Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #3 F,A | Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2 [11,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #4 F,A | Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3 [8,13] (-) 3 [2,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #5 A | Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) = Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1 [13,13] (-) 1 [13,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #7 A | Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) = Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2 [11,13] (-) 2 [11,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #9 A | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) = Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered) Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3 [8,13] (-) 2 [11,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #12 A | Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #13 A | Contradiction (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 1 [13,13] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #20 F,A | Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #21 A | Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #25 A | Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #26 A | Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [11,11] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #28 A | Probability of Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1 [8,8] (-) 0 [0,0] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #30 A | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0 [0,0] (-) 1 [11,11] |
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #32 F,A | Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Estrangement Model FINAL | #36 A | Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication Present In 1 View:Used By
|
![]() |
Top | (Type) Subscripts (0 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description |
Top | (Type) Data (0 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description |
Top | (Type) Game (0 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description |
Top | (Type) Lookup (6 Variables) | ||
Variable Name And Description | Estrangement Model FINAL | #6 A,T | Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup([(0,-0.01)-(1,0.01)],(0,0.01),(0.0448065,0.00933649),(0.0936864,0.00800948),(0.158859,0.00488152),(0.215886,0.00127962),(0.287169,-0.00298578),(0.368635,-0.00563981),(0.505092,-0.00800948),(0.653768,-0.00905213),(0.753564,-0.00952607),(1,-0.01) ) ![]()
|
Estrangement Model FINAL | #8 A,T | Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup([(0,-0.01)-(1,0.01)],(0,0.01),(0.132383,0.008863),(0.226069,0.00763),(0.313646,0.005735),(0.415479,0.002891),(0.501018,3.318e-05),(0.594705,-0.002891),(0.725051,-0.00630332),(0.837067,-0.008294),(0.906314,-0.009431),(1,-0.01) ) ![]()
|
Estrangement Model FINAL | #10 A,T | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup([(0,-0.1)-(46,0.01)],(0,0.01),(2.90428,0.00900474),(6.1833,0.00331754),(9.93075,-0.00805687),(12.9287,-0.0218009),(15.5519,-0.0379621),(18.9246,-0.0609005),(21.9226,-0.076019),(26.0448,-0.0864455),(31.1976,-0.0921801),(39.3483,-0.0973934),(46,-0.1) ) ![]()
|
Estrangement Model FINAL | #27 A,T | Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup([(0,0)-(1,1)],(0,0),(1,1) ) ![]()
|
Estrangement Model FINAL | #29 A,T | Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup([(0,0)-(1,1)],(0,0),(0.258656,0.0236967),(0.364562,0.0758294),(0.490835,0.208531),(0.596741,0.350711),(0.743381,0.587678),(1,1) ) ![]()
|
Estrangement Model FINAL | #31 A,T | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup([(0,0)-(1,1)],(0,1),(0.311609,0.236967),(0.360489,0.137441),(0.417515,0.0521327),(0.5,0),(0.590631,0.028436),(0.676171,0.0853081),(0.767821,0.21327),(0.851324,0.398104),(0.916497,0.611374),(0.965377,0.810427),(1,1) ) ![]()
|
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Estrangement (dmnl) | 1 | 4 | 0.25 | 1| 0| 0 | 1| 2| 1 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) | 1 | 3 | 0.33 | 1| 0| 0 | 1| 2| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 2| 0| 0 | 2| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 2| 1| 0 | 0| 1| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 1| 1| 0 | 1| 1| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1| 1| 1 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1| 2| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1| 2| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Week (Week) | 0 | 3 | 0.00 | 0| 0| 0 | 0| 2| 1 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 0| 0| 2 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Feedback (dmnl) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 2| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 2| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 2| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 2| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Contradiction (Hours/Week) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 2| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 2| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Communication (dmnl) | 1 | 2 | 0.50 | 1| 0| 0 | 1| 1| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 0| 2| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 0| 2| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 0| 2| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) | 2 | 1 | 2.00 | 2| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 1| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
.Control | C | TIME STEP (Week ) | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
.Control | A | SAVEPER (Week ) | 1 | 0 | ∞ | 1| 0| 0 | 0| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Normal Let Go Time (Week) | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0| 0| 0 | 0| 1| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Days in a week (Days/Week) | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0| 0| 0 | 1| 0| 0 |
.Control | C | INITIAL TIME (Week) | ( 0| 0) | ∞ | 0| 0| 0 | 0| 0| 0 |
.Control | C | FINAL TIME (Week) | ( 0| 0) | ∞ | 0| 0| 0 | 0| 0| 0 |
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Estrangement (dmnl) |
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A,T | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A,T | Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup (dmnl) | Both |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A,T | Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup (dmnl) | Both |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A,T | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup (dmnl) | Both |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A,T | Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup (dmnl) | Both |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A,T | Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl) | Both |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A,T | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl) | Both |
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) |
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Communication (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Estrangement (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Feedback (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) |
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) | LHS Units: (Dmnl) RHS Units: LOOKUP used with dimensioned argument < (Hour) > Complete RHS Units: LOOKUP ( Dmnl , Hour ) |
1/Week | Basic | [dmnl/Week] |
Dmnl | Basic | [dmnl] |
Hour | Basic | [Hours] |
Week | Basic | |
Day/Week | Combined | [Days/Week] |
Hour/Day | Combined | [Hours/Days] |
Hour/Week | Combined | [Hours/Week] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) | 6 (66.7%) | 3 [8,13] | 3 [2,13] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) | 6 (66.7%) | 3 [8,13] | 3 [2,13] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) | 6 (66.7%) | 3 [8,13] | 3 [2,13] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) | 5 (55.6%) | 2 [11,13] | 3 [2,13] | 0.67 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) | 5 (55.6%) | 3 [8,13] | 2 [11,13] | 1.50 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Estrangement (dmnl) | 5 (55.6%) | 2 [11,13] | 3 [2,13] | 0.67 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) | 4 (44.4%) | 2 [11,13] | 2 [11,13] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) | 4 (44.4%) | 2 [8,13] | 2 [2,11] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) | 3 (33.3%) | 1 [13,13] | 2 [2,13] | 0.50 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | L | Communication (dmnl) | 3 (33.3%) | 1 [13,13] | 2 [2,13] | 0.50 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) | 3 (33.3%) | 2 [8,13] | 1 [11,11] | 2.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) | 2 (22.2%) | 1 [13,13] | 1 [13,13] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Contradiction (Hours/Week) | 2 (22.2%) | 1 [11,11] | 1 [13,13] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) | 2 (22.2%) | 1 [8,8] | 1 [11,11] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | F,A | Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) | 2 (22.2%) | 1 [11,11] | 1 [13,13] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) | 2 (22.2%) | 1 [13,13] | 1 [13,13] | 1.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) | 1 (11.1%) | 1 [11,11] | 0 [0,0] | Infinite | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) | 1 (11.1%) | 1 [11,11] | 0 [0,0] | Infinite | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Feedback (dmnl) | 1 (11.1%) | 1 [8,8] | 0 [0,0] | Infinite | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) | 1 (11.1%) | 0 [0,0] | 1 [11,11] | 0.00 | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Days in a week (Days/Week) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
.Control | C | FINAL TIME (Week) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
.Control | C | INITIAL TIME (Week) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | A | Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Normal Let Go Time (Week) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
.Control | A | SAVEPER (Week ) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
.Control | C | TIME STEP (Week ) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Estrangement Model FINAL | C | Week (Week) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] | 0 ( 0.0%) | 0 [0,0] | 0 [0,0] | NA | 0 [0,0] |
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Quick Links: | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
Estrangement | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback | Lookup Inconsistent |
Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup | Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback | Lookup Inconsistent |
Week | Change in Trust | Inconsistent |
View 1 | 26 vars (68.4%) |