Documentation Of Estrangement Model FINAL




Quick Links All Variables Variable Link Detail Variable Types Views Groups Units Macros Feedback Loops Loop List No IVV Link Polarity View Summary View-Variable Profile

Model Assessment Results

Model Information Result
30
4 (13.3%)
4 (13.3%)
9 (3|6|0)
0 (0|0|0)
43 (27|13|3)
0
4/3
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
12 (40.0%)
26 (86.7%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Time Unit
Week
Initial Time
0
Final Time
2607.14
Reported Time Interval
TIME STEP
Time Step
1
Model Is Fully Formulated
Yes
Model Defined Groups
No

Warnings Result
16 (53.3%)
2 (6.7%)
0 (0.0%)
1 (3.3%)
0 (0.0%)
6 (20.0%)
4 (13.3%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
1 (3.3%)

Potential Omissions Result
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)


Variable Types

L: Level (4 / 4)* SM: Smooth (0 / 0)* DE: Delay (0 / 0)*† LI: Level Initial (0) I: Initial (0 / 0)
C: Constant (8 / 8) F: Flow (5 / 5) A: Auxiliary (24 / 24) Sub: Subscripts (0) D: Data (0 / 0)
G: Game (0 / 0) T: Lookup (6 / 6)*††      
* (State Variables/Total Stocks) † Total Stocks Do Not Include Fixed Delay Variables. †† (Lookup Tables).  

Views

View: View 1 (26) Variables



Groups

Estrangement Model FINAL (26)    



Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

Top(All) Variables (30 Variables)
Group
Type
Variable Name And Description
Thumbnail
Estrangement Model FINAL #1
A
Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
=
Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL #2
F,A
Change in Communication (dmnl/Week)
= IF THEN ELSE((
Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week
Present In 1 View:Used By
  • Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them.
Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL #3
F,A
Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)
= IF THEN ELSE((
Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL #4
F,A
Change in Trust (dmnl/Week)
= IF THEN ELSE((
Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL #5
A
Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl)
=
Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week)
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL #7
A
Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl)
=
Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent)
Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week)
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL #9
A
Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl)
=
Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered)
Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week)
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL #11
L
Communication (dmnl)
=
Change in Communication dt + 1.0
Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them.
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL #12
A
Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week)
=
Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation
Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL #13
A
Contradiction (Hours/Week)
=
Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL #14
L
Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours)
=
Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0
Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL #15
C
Days in a week (Days/Week)
= 7
Present In 1 View:
Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL #16
L
Estrangement (dmnl)
=
Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0
Present In 1 View:Used By
  • Change in Estrangement
  • Changes in Communication due to Estrangement !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week)
  • Probability of Contradiction !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours)
  • Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
.Control #17
C
FINAL TIME (Week)
= 2607.14
Description: The final time for the simulation.
Present In 0 Views:
    Used By
      Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
      Estrangement Model FINAL #18
      C
      Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days)
      = 6
      Present In 1 View:
      Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
      .Control #19
      C
      INITIAL TIME (Week)
      = 0
      Description: The initial time for the simulation.
      Present In 0 Views:
        Used By
          Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
          Estrangement Model FINAL #20
          F,A
          Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)
          = IF THEN ELSE((
          Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation))
          Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)
          Present In 1 View:Used By
          • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
          Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
          Estrangement Model FINAL #21
          A
          Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week)
          =
          Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day
          Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
          Estrangement Model FINAL #23
          C
          Normal Let Go Time (Week)
          = 2
          Present In 1 View:
          Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
          Estrangement Model FINAL #24
          C
          Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
          = 0.1
          Present In 1 View:
          Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
          Estrangement Model FINAL #25
          A
          Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl)
          =
          Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback
          Present In 1 View:Used By
          • Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
          Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 1  [11,11]
          Estrangement Model FINAL #26
          A
          Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
          =
          Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
          Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours)
          Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
          Estrangement Model FINAL #28
          A
          Probability of Feedback (dmnl)
          =
          Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent)
          Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
          Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 0  [0,0]
          Estrangement Model FINAL #30
          A
          Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl)
          =
          Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
          Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
          Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 1  [11,11]
          Estrangement Model FINAL #32
          F,A
          Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week)
          =
          Contradiction
          Present In 1 View:Used By
          • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
          Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
          .Control #33
          A
          SAVEPER (Week )
          =
          TIME STEP
          Description: The frequency with which output is stored.
          Present In 0 Views:
            Used By
              Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
              .Control #35
              C
              TIME STEP (Week )
              = 1
              Description: The time step for the simulation.
              Present In 0 Views:
                Used By
                • SAVEPER The frequency with which output is stored.
                Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #36
                A
                Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                =
                Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                • Contradiction
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #37
                L
                Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Trust dt + 1.0
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Change in Trust
                • Changes in Estrangement due to Trust !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week)
                • Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
                Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #38
                C
                Week (Week)
                = 1
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                (View) View 1 (26 Variables)
                Top(View) View 1 (26 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Estrangement Model FINAL #1
                A
                Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                =
                Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #2
                F,A
                Change in Communication (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them.
                Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #3
                F,A
                Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #4
                F,A
                Change in Trust (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #5
                A
                Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl)
                =
                Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
                Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #7
                A
                Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl)
                =
                Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent)
                Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #9
                A
                Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl)
                =
                Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered)
                Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #11
                L
                Communication (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Communication dt + 1.0
                Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #12
                A
                Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week)
                =
                Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation
                Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 1  [11,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #13
                A
                Contradiction (Hours/Week)
                =
                Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #14
                L
                Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours)
                =
                Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0
                Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #15
                C
                Days in a week (Days/Week)
                = 7
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #16
                L
                Estrangement (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Change in Estrangement
                • Changes in Communication due to Estrangement !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week)
                • Probability of Contradiction !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours)
                • Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
                Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #18
                C
                Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days)
                = 6
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #20
                F,A
                Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation))
                Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #21
                A
                Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                =
                Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #23
                C
                Normal Let Go Time (Week)
                = 2
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #24
                C
                Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                = 0.1
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #25
                A
                Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 1  [11,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #26
                A
                Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
                Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #28
                A
                Probability of Feedback (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent)
                Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #30
                A
                Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
                Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 1  [11,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #32
                F,A
                Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week)
                =
                Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #36
                A
                Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                =
                Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                • Contradiction
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #37
                L
                Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Trust dt + 1.0
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Change in Trust
                • Changes in Estrangement due to Trust !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week)
                • Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
                Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #38
                C
                Week (Week)
                = 1
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Top(Group) Estrangement Model FINAL (26 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Estrangement Model FINAL #1
                A
                Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                =
                Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #2
                F,A
                Change in Communication (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them.
                Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #3
                F,A
                Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #4
                F,A
                Change in Trust (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #5
                A
                Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl)
                =
                Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
                Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #7
                A
                Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl)
                =
                Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent)
                Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #9
                A
                Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl)
                =
                Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered)
                Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #11
                L
                Communication (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Communication dt + 1.0
                Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #12
                A
                Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week)
                =
                Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation
                Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 1  [11,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #13
                A
                Contradiction (Hours/Week)
                =
                Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #14
                L
                Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours)
                =
                Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0
                Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #15
                C
                Days in a week (Days/Week)
                = 7
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #16
                L
                Estrangement (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Change in Estrangement
                • Changes in Communication due to Estrangement !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week)
                • Probability of Contradiction !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours)
                • Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
                Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #18
                C
                Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days)
                = 6
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #20
                F,A
                Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation))
                Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #21
                A
                Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                =
                Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #23
                C
                Normal Let Go Time (Week)
                = 2
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #24
                C
                Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                = 0.1
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #25
                A
                Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 1  [11,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #26
                A
                Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
                Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #28
                A
                Probability of Feedback (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent)
                Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #30
                A
                Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
                Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 1  [11,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #32
                F,A
                Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week)
                =
                Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #36
                A
                Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                =
                Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                • Contradiction
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #37
                L
                Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Trust dt + 1.0
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Change in Trust
                • Changes in Estrangement due to Trust !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week)
                • Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
                Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #38
                C
                Week (Week)
                = 1
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Top(Type) Level (4 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Estrangement Model FINAL #11
                L
                Communication (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Communication dt + 1.0
                Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #14
                L
                Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours)
                =
                Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0
                Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #16
                L
                Estrangement (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Change in Estrangement
                • Changes in Communication due to Estrangement !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week)
                • Probability of Contradiction !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours)
                • Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
                Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #37
                L
                Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl)
                =
                Change in Trust dt + 1.0
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Change in Trust
                • Changes in Estrangement due to Trust !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week)
                • Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
                Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Top(Type) Smooth (0 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Top(Type) Delay (0 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Top(Type) Level Initial (0 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Top(Type) Initial (0 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Top(Type) Constant (5 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Estrangement Model FINAL #15
                C
                Days in a week (Days/Week)
                = 7
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #18
                C
                Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days)
                = 6
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #23
                C
                Normal Let Go Time (Week)
                = 2
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #24
                C
                Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                = 0.1
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #38
                C
                Week (Week)
                = 1
                Present In 1 View:
                Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Top(Type) Flow (5 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Estrangement Model FINAL #2
                F,A
                Change in Communication (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them.
                Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #3
                F,A
                Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #4
                F,A
                Change in Trust (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #20
                F,A
                Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation))
                Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #32
                F,A
                Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week)
                =
                Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Top(Type) Auxiliary (17 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Estrangement Model FINAL #1
                A
                Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                =
                Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #2
                F,A
                Change in Communication (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them.
                Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #3
                F,A
                Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #4
                F,A
                Change in Trust (dmnl/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #5
                A
                Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl)
                =
                Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
                Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #7
                A
                Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl)
                =
                Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent)
                Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #9
                A
                Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl)
                =
                Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered)
                Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #12
                A
                Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week)
                =
                Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation
                Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 1  [11,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #13
                A
                Contradiction (Hours/Week)
                =
                Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #20
                F,A
                Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)
                = IF THEN ELSE((
                Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation))
                Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #21
                A
                Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                =
                Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #25
                A
                Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 1  [11,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #26
                A
                Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
                Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours)
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #28
                A
                Probability of Feedback (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent)
                Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 0  [0,0]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #30
                A
                Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl)
                =
                Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement)
                Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
                Present In 1 View:Used ByFeedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 1  [11,11]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #32
                F,A
                Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week)
                =
                Contradiction
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust.
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Estrangement Model FINAL #36
                A
                Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                =
                Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication
                Present In 1 View:Used By
                • Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more.
                • Contradiction
                Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
                Top(Type) Subscripts (0 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Top(Type) Data (0 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Top(Type) Game (0 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Thumbnail
                Top(Type) Lookup (6 Variables)
                Group
                Type
                Variable Name And Description
                Estrangement Model FINAL #6
                A,T
                Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup (dmnl)
                Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup([(0,-0.01)-(1,0.01)],(0,0.01),(0.0448065,0.00933649),(0.0936864,0.00800948),(0.158859,0.00488152),(0.215886,0.00127962),(0.287169,-0.00298578),(0.368635,-0.00563981),(0.505092,-0.00800948),(0.653768,-0.00905213),(0.753564,-0.00952607),(1,-0.01) )

                Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week)
                Present In 0 Views:
                  Used By
                  Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                  Estrangement Model FINAL #8
                  A,T
                  Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup (dmnl)
                  Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup([(0,-0.01)-(1,0.01)],(0,0.01),(0.132383,0.008863),(0.226069,0.00763),(0.313646,0.005735),(0.415479,0.002891),(0.501018,3.318e-05),(0.594705,-0.002891),(0.725051,-0.00630332),(0.837067,-0.008294),(0.906314,-0.009431),(1,-0.01) )

                  Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week)
                  Present In 0 Views:
                    Used By
                    Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                    Estrangement Model FINAL #10
                    A,T
                    Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup (dmnl)
                    Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup([(0,-0.1)-(46,0.01)],(0,0.01),(2.90428,0.00900474),(6.1833,0.00331754),(9.93075,-0.00805687),(12.9287,-0.0218009),(15.5519,-0.0379621),(18.9246,-0.0609005),(21.9226,-0.076019),(26.0448,-0.0864455),(31.1976,-0.0921801),(39.3483,-0.0973934),(46,-0.1) )

                    Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week)
                    Present In 0 Views:
                      Used By
                      Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                      Estrangement Model FINAL #27
                      A,T
                      Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup (dmnl)
                      Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup([(0,0)-(1,1)],(0,0),(1,1) )

                      Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours)
                      Present In 0 Views:
                        Used By
                        Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                        Estrangement Model FINAL #29
                        A,T
                        Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl)
                        Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup([(0,0)-(1,1)],(0,0),(0.258656,0.0236967),(0.364562,0.0758294),(0.490835,0.208531),(0.596741,0.350711),(0.743381,0.587678),(1,1) )

                        Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
                        Present In 0 Views:
                          Used By
                          • Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent.
                          Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
                          Estrangement Model FINAL #31
                          A,T
                          Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl)
                          Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup([(0,0)-(1,1)],(0,1),(0.311609,0.236967),(0.360489,0.137441),(0.417515,0.0521327),(0.5,0),(0.590631,0.028436),(0.676171,0.0853081),(0.767821,0.21327),(0.851324,0.398104),(0.916497,0.611374),(0.965377,0.810427),(1,1) )

                          Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
                          Present In 0 Views:
                            Used By
                            • Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances.
                            Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]


                            Top

                            Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

                            All Variables (30)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Estrangement Model FINALAActual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Communication (dmnl/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Trust (dmnl/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLCommunication (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAConstructive Conversation (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAContradiction (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLContradiction Actively Remembered (Hours)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCDays in a week (Days/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLEstrangement (dmnl)
                            .ControlCFINAL TIME (Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCHours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days)
                            .ControlCINITIAL TIME (Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,ALetting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAMaximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCNormal Let Go Time (Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCNormal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Feedback (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,ARegistering new contradictions (Hours/Week)
                            .ControlASAVEPER (Week )
                            .ControlCTIME STEP (Week )
                            Estrangement Model FINALATotal Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLTrust Child Has in Parent (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCWeek (Week)



                            Top

                            Variable Link Detail (30)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            In/Out Counts
                             In/Out Ratio 
                            In Links by Polarity
                            Out Links by Polarity
                            Estrangement Model FINALLEstrangement (dmnl)  1 |  4  0.25    1| 0| 0    1| 2| 1
                            Estrangement Model FINALLTrust Child Has in Parent (dmnl)  1 |  3  0.33    1| 0| 0    1| 2| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALATotal Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week)  2 |  2  1.00    2| 0| 0    2| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,ALetting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)  3 |  1  3.00    2| 1| 0    0| 1| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALLContradiction Actively Remembered (Hours)  2 |  2  1.00    1| 1| 0    1| 1| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Trust (dmnl/Week)  3 |  1  3.00    1| 1| 1    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)  3 |  1  3.00    1| 2| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Communication (dmnl/Week)  3 |  1  3.00    1| 2| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALCWeek (Week)  0 |  3  0.00    0| 0| 0    0| 2| 1
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl)  2 |  1  2.00    0| 0| 2    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Feedback (dmnl)  2 |  1  2.00    2| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Contradiction (dmnl)  2 |  1  2.00    2| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl)  2 |  1  2.00    2| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAMaximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week)  2 |  1  2.00    2| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAContradiction (Hours/Week)  2 |  1  2.00    2| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAConstructive Conversation (Hours/Week)  2 |  1  2.00    2| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALLCommunication (dmnl)  1 |  2  0.50    1| 0| 0    1| 1| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl)  2 |  1  2.00    0| 2| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl)  2 |  1  2.00    0| 2| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl)  2 |  1  2.00    0| 2| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALAActual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)  2 |  1  2.00    2| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,ARegistering new contradictions (Hours/Week)  1 |  1  1.00    1| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            .ControlCTIME STEP (Week )  0 |  1  0.00    0| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            .ControlASAVEPER (Week )  1 |  0   âˆž    1| 0| 0    0| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALCNormal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)  0 |  1  0.00    0| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALCNormal Let Go Time (Week)  0 |  1  0.00    0| 0| 0    0| 1| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALCHours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days)  0 |  1  0.00    0| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            Estrangement Model FINALCDays in a week (Days/Week)  0 |  1  0.00    0| 0| 0    1| 0| 0
                            .ControlCINITIAL TIME (Week) ( 0| 0)   âˆž    0| 0| 0    0| 0| 0
                            .ControlCFINAL TIME (Week) ( 0| 0)   âˆž    0| 0| 0    0| 0| 0


                            Top

                            Supplementary Variables (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Supplementary Variables Being Used (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Unused Variables (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

                            Equations With Embedded Data (2)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Estrangement Model FINALLContradiction Actively Remembered (Hours)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLEstrangement (dmnl)



                            Top

                            Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

                            Nonmonotonic Lookup Functions (1)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Estrangement Model FINALA,TProbability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl)



                            Top

                            Non-Zero End Sloped Lookup Functions (6)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Non-Zero
                            Estrangement Model FINALA,TChanges in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup (dmnl)Both
                            Estrangement Model FINALA,TChanges in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup (dmnl)Both
                            Estrangement Model FINALA,TChanges in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup (dmnl)Both
                            Estrangement Model FINALA,TProbability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup (dmnl)Both
                            Estrangement Model FINALA,TProbability of Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl)Both
                            Estrangement Model FINALA,TProbability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl)Both


                            Top

                            Cascading Lookup Functions (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Equations With Step Pulse Or Related Functions (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

                            Equations With If Then Else Functions (4)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Communication (dmnl/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Trust (dmnl/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,ALetting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)



                            Top

                            Equations With Min Or Max Functions (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Complex Variable (Richardson's Rule Threshold = 3) (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Complexity


                            Top

                            Complex Stock (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Variables With Source Information (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

                            Variables With Dimensionless Units (12)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Estrangement Model FINALAActual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLCommunication (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLEstrangement (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCNormal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Feedback (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLTrust Child Has in Parent (dmnl)



                            Top

                            Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

                            Variables without Predefined Min or Max Values (26)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Estrangement Model FINALAActual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Communication (dmnl/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Trust (dmnl/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLCommunication (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAConstructive Conversation (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAContradiction (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLContradiction Actively Remembered (Hours)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCDays in a week (Days/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLEstrangement (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCHours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,ALetting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAMaximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCNormal Let Go Time (Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCNormal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Contradiction (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Feedback (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,ARegistering new contradictions (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALATotal Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week)
                            Estrangement Model FINALLTrust Child Has in Parent (dmnl)
                            Estrangement Model FINALCWeek (Week)



                            Top

                            Function Sensitivity Parameters (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Data Lookup Tables (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Variables Not In Any View (0)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable



                            Top

                            Equations With Unit Errors Or Warnings (1)

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Units
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) LHS Units: (Dmnl)
                            RHS Units: LOOKUP used with dimensioned argument < (Hour) >
                            Complete RHS Units: LOOKUP ( Dmnl , Hour )


                            Top

                            Units (4/3)

                            Units
                            Type
                            Alternates
                            1/Week Basic [dmnl/Week]
                            Dmnl Basic [dmnl]
                            Hour Basic [Hours]
                            Week Basic
                            Day/Week Combined [Days/Week]
                            Hour/Day Combined [Hours/Days]
                            Hour/Week Combined [Hours/Week]



                            Top

                            Feedback Loops (9|0 Maximum Length: 30 [2,13] | [0,0])

                            Group
                            Type
                            Variable
                            Loops
                             + 
                             - 
                             +/- Ratio 
                             ? 
                            Loops (IVV)
                             + 
                             - 
                             +/- Ratio 
                             ? 
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Trust (dmnl/Week)6 (66.7%)3 [8,13]3 [2,13]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALLContradiction Actively Remembered (Hours)6 (66.7%)3 [8,13]3 [2,13]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALLTrust Child Has in Parent (dmnl)6 (66.7%)3 [8,13]3 [2,13]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Estrangement (dmnl/Week)5 (55.6%)2 [11,13]3 [2,13]0.670 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl)5 (55.6%)3 [8,13]2 [11,13]1.500 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALLEstrangement (dmnl)5 (55.6%)2 [11,13]3 [2,13]0.670 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl)4 (44.4%)2 [11,13]2 [11,13]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,ALetting go of contradiction (Hours/Week)4 (44.4%)2 [8,13]2 [2,11]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,AChange in Communication (dmnl/Week)3 (33.3%)1 [13,13]2 [2,13]0.500 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALLCommunication (dmnl)3 (33.3%)1 [13,13]2 [2,13]0.500 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAConstructive Conversation (Hours/Week)3 (33.3%)2 [8,13]1 [11,11]2.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAChanges in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl)2 (22.2%)1 [13,13]1 [13,13]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAContradiction (Hours/Week)2 (22.2%)1 [11,11]1 [13,13]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl)2 (22.2%)1 [8,8]1 [11,11]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALF,ARegistering new contradictions (Hours/Week)2 (22.2%)1 [11,11]1 [13,13]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALATotal Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week)2 (22.2%)1 [13,13]1 [13,13]1.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAActual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)1 (11.1%)1 [11,11]0 [0,0]Infinite0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Contradiction (dmnl)1 (11.1%)1 [11,11]0 [0,0]Infinite0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Feedback (dmnl)1 (11.1%)1 [8,8]0 [0,0]Infinite0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAProbability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl)1 (11.1%)0 [0,0]1 [11,11]0.000 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALCDays in a week (Days/Week)0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            .ControlCFINAL TIME (Week)0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALCHours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days)0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            .ControlCINITIAL TIME (Week)0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALAMaximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week)0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALCNormal Let Go Time (Week)0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALCNormal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl)0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            .ControlASAVEPER (Week )0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            .ControlCTIME STEP (Week )0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]
                            Estrangement Model FINALCWeek (Week)0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]0 ( 0.0%)0 [0,0]0 [0,0]NA0 [0,0]


                            Top

                            Macros (0)

                            Name
                            Macro Definition
                            Expanded Macro Definition



                            Top

                            Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

                            Positive Polarity Causal Links (27)

                            Cause
                            Effect
                            Polarity
                            Actual Probability of ContradictionContradiction+
                            Change in CommunicationCommunication+
                            Change in EstrangementEstrangement+
                            Change in TrustTrust Child Has in Parent+
                            Changes in Communication due to EstrangementChange in Communication+
                            Changes in Estrangement due to TrustChange in Estrangement+
                            Changes in Trust due to ContradictionsChange in Trust+
                            CommunicationTotal Communication Time per Week+
                            Constructive ConversationLetting go of contradiction+
                            ContradictionRegistering new contradictions+
                            Contradiction Actively RememberedLetting go of contradiction+
                            Days in a weekMaximum Contact Time per Week+
                            EstrangementProbability of Contradiction+
                            Hours spent with parent in a dayMaximum Contact Time per Week+
                            Maximum Contact Time per WeekTotal Communication Time per Week+
                            Normal Probability of ContradictionActual Probability of Contradiction+
                            Probability of Constructive ConversationConstructive Conversation+
                            Probability of ContradictionActual Probability of Contradiction+
                            Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookupProbability of Contradiction+
                            Probability of FeedbackProbability of Constructive Conversation+
                            Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookupProbability of Feedback+
                            Probability of Parent Accepting FeedbackProbability of Constructive Conversation+
                            Registering new contradictionsContradiction Actively Remembered+
                            TIME STEPSAVEPER+
                            Total Communication Time per WeekConstructive Conversation+
                            Total Communication Time per WeekContradiction+
                            Trust Child Has in ParentProbability of Feedback+



                            Top

                            Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

                            Negative Polarity Causal Links (13)

                            Cause
                            Effect
                            Polarity
                            Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookupChanges in Communication due to Estrangement-
                            Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookupChanges in Estrangement due to Trust-
                            Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookupChanges in Trust due to Contradictions-
                            CommunicationChange in Communication-
                            Contradiction Actively RememberedChanges in Trust due to Contradictions-
                            EstrangementChange in Estrangement-
                            EstrangementChanges in Communication due to Estrangement-
                            Letting go of contradictionContradiction Actively Remembered-
                            Normal Let Go TimeLetting go of contradiction-
                            Trust Child Has in ParentChange in Trust-
                            Trust Child Has in ParentChanges in Estrangement due to Trust-
                            WeekChange in Communication-
                            WeekChange in Estrangement-



                            Top

                            Quick Links:  A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z 

                            Function-based Polarity Causal Links (3)

                            Cause
                            Effect
                            Polarity
                            EstrangementProbability of Parent Accepting FeedbackLookup Inconsistent
                            Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookupProbability of Parent Accepting FeedbackLookup Inconsistent
                            WeekChange in TrustInconsistent



                            Top

                            Rate-to-rate Links (0)

                            Cause
                            Effect



                            Top

                            View-Variable Profile

                            View
                            View-Variable Profile
                            View 1                                                                                                                                           26 vars (68.4%)

                            Top

                            List Of 1 views and their 26 Variables

                             
                            View 1
                             
                            Total: 26 Total:
                            Change in Trust (In 1 View)     Change in Trust (In 1 View)
                            Contradiction Actively Remembered (In 1 View)     Contradiction Actively Remembered (In 1 View)
                            Days in a week (In 1 View)     Days in a week (In 1 View)
                            Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (In 1 View)     Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (In 1 View)
                            Estrangement (In 1 View)     Estrangement (In 1 View)
                            Actual Probability of Contradiction (In 1 View)     Actual Probability of Contradiction (In 1 View)
                            Total Communication Time per Week (In 1 View)     Total Communication Time per Week (In 1 View)
                            Contradiction (In 1 View)     Contradiction (In 1 View)
                            Communication (In 1 View)     Communication (In 1 View)
                            Probability of Contradiction (In 1 View)     Probability of Contradiction (In 1 View)
                            Trust Child Has in Parent (In 1 View)     Trust Child Has in Parent (In 1 View)
                            Registering new contradictions (In 1 View)     Registering new contradictions (In 1 View)
                            Probability of Constructive Conversation (In 1 View)     Probability of Constructive Conversation (In 1 View)
                            Normal Probability of Contradiction (In 1 View)     Normal Probability of Contradiction (In 1 View)
                            Change in Estrangement (In 1 View)     Change in Estrangement (In 1 View)
                            Change in Communication (In 1 View)     Change in Communication (In 1 View)
                            Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (In 1 View)     Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (In 1 View)
                            Letting go of contradiction (In 1 View)     Letting go of contradiction (In 1 View)
                            Maximum Contact Time per Week (In 1 View)     Maximum Contact Time per Week (In 1 View)
                            Normal Let Go Time (In 1 View)     Normal Let Go Time (In 1 View)
                            Constructive Conversation (In 1 View)     Constructive Conversation (In 1 View)
                            Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (In 1 View)     Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (In 1 View)
                            Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (In 1 View)     Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (In 1 View)
                            Week (In 1 View)     Week (In 1 View)
                            Probability of Feedback (In 1 View)     Probability of Feedback (In 1 View)
                            Hours spent with parent in a day (In 1 View)     Hours spent with parent in a day (In 1 View)
                            Total: 26 Total:
                             
                            View 1
                             

                            Source File: C:\Users\rc4olle\Dropbox\A7_Independent Project Module\Clarisse\Edited for Peter Hovmand\Estrangement Model FINAL.mdl (Thu May 24 02:22:14 SGT 2018)
                            Report Created On Tue Jun 04 12:44:48 SGT 2019
                            SDM-Doc Tool Version 1.2.89
                            Global Security Sciences Division
                            Argonne National Laboratory