View: View 1 (26) Variables

Top	(All) Variables (30 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail
Estrangement Model FINAL	#1 A	Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#2 F,A	Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#3 F,A	Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Estrangement Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#4 F,A	Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Trust Child Has in Parent Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#5 A	Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) = Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#7 A	Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) = Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Estrangement Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#9 A	Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) = Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered) Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Trust Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#11 L	Communication (dmnl) = ∫Change in Communication dt + 1.0 Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Total Communication Time per Week Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#12 A	Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#13 A	Contradiction (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Registering new contradictions Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#14 L	Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) = ∫Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0 Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Changes in Trust due to Contradictions !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#15 C	Days in a week (Days/Week) = 7 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Maximum Contact Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#16 L	Estrangement (dmnl) = ∫Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Estrangement Changes in Communication due to Estrangement !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Probability of Contradiction !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
.Control	#17 C	FINAL TIME (Week) = 2607.14 Description: The final time for the simulation. Present In 0 Views: Used By Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#18 C	Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) = 6 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Maximum Contact Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
.Control	#19 C	INITIAL TIME (Week) = 0 Description: The initial time for the simulation. Present In 0 Views: Used By Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#20 F,A	Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#21 A	Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Total Communication Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#23 C	Normal Let Go Time (Week) = 2 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#24 C	Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = 0.1 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Actual Probability of Contradiction Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#25 A	Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#26 A	Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Actual Probability of Contradiction Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#28 A	Probability of Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Probability of Constructive Conversation Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#30 A	Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Probability of Constructive Conversation Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#32 F,A	Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
.Control	#33 A	SAVEPER (Week ) = TIME STEP Description: The frequency with which output is stored. Present In 0 Views: Used By Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
.Control	#35 C	TIME STEP (Week ) = 1 Description: The time step for the simulation. Present In 0 Views: Used By SAVEPER The frequency with which output is stored. Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#36 A	Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Contradiction Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#37 L	Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) = ∫Change in Trust dt + 1.0 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Trust Changes in Estrangement due to Trust !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#38 C	Week (Week) = 1 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Change in Estrangement Change in Trust Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]

(View) View 1 (26 Variables)

Top	(View) View 1 (26 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail
Estrangement Model FINAL	#1 A	Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#2 F,A	Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#3 F,A	Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Estrangement Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#4 F,A	Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Trust Child Has in Parent Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#5 A	Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) = Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#7 A	Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) = Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Estrangement Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#9 A	Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) = Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered) Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Trust Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#11 L	Communication (dmnl) = ∫Change in Communication dt + 1.0 Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Total Communication Time per Week Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#12 A	Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#13 A	Contradiction (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Registering new contradictions Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#14 L	Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) = ∫Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0 Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Changes in Trust due to Contradictions !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#15 C	Days in a week (Days/Week) = 7 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Maximum Contact Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#16 L	Estrangement (dmnl) = ∫Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Estrangement Changes in Communication due to Estrangement !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Probability of Contradiction !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#18 C	Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) = 6 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Maximum Contact Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#20 F,A	Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#21 A	Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Total Communication Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#23 C	Normal Let Go Time (Week) = 2 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#24 C	Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = 0.1 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Actual Probability of Contradiction Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#25 A	Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#26 A	Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Actual Probability of Contradiction Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#28 A	Probability of Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Probability of Constructive Conversation Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#30 A	Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Probability of Constructive Conversation Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#32 F,A	Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#36 A	Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Contradiction Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#37 L	Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) = ∫Change in Trust dt + 1.0 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Trust Changes in Estrangement due to Trust !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#38 C	Week (Week) = 1 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Change in Estrangement Change in Trust Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]

Top	(Group) Estrangement Model FINAL (26 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail
Estrangement Model FINAL	#1 A	Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#2 F,A	Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#3 F,A	Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Estrangement Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#4 F,A	Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Trust Child Has in Parent Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#5 A	Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) = Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#7 A	Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) = Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Estrangement Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#9 A	Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) = Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered) Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Trust Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#11 L	Communication (dmnl) = ∫Change in Communication dt + 1.0 Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Total Communication Time per Week Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#12 A	Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#13 A	Contradiction (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Registering new contradictions Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#14 L	Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) = ∫Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0 Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Changes in Trust due to Contradictions !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#15 C	Days in a week (Days/Week) = 7 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Maximum Contact Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#16 L	Estrangement (dmnl) = ∫Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Estrangement Changes in Communication due to Estrangement !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Probability of Contradiction !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#18 C	Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) = 6 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Maximum Contact Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#20 F,A	Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#21 A	Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Total Communication Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#23 C	Normal Let Go Time (Week) = 2 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#24 C	Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = 0.1 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Actual Probability of Contradiction Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#25 A	Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#26 A	Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Actual Probability of Contradiction Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#28 A	Probability of Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Probability of Constructive Conversation Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#30 A	Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Probability of Constructive Conversation Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#32 F,A	Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#36 A	Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Contradiction Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#37 L	Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) = ∫Change in Trust dt + 1.0 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Trust Changes in Estrangement due to Trust !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#38 C	Week (Week) = 1 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Change in Estrangement Change in Trust Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]

Top	(Type) Level (4 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail
Estrangement Model FINAL	#11 L	Communication (dmnl) = ∫Change in Communication dt + 1.0 Description: As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Total Communication Time per Week Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#14 L	Contradiction Actively Remembered (Hours) = ∫Registering new contradictions-Letting go of contradiction dt + 0.0 Description: Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Changes in Trust due to Contradictions !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#16 L	Estrangement (dmnl) = ∫Change in Estrangement dt + 0.0 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Estrangement Changes in Communication due to Estrangement !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Probability of Contradiction !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#37 L	Trust Child Has in Parent (dmnl) = ∫Change in Trust dt + 1.0 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Trust Changes in Estrangement due to Trust !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]

Top	(Type) Smooth (0 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail

Top	(Type) Delay (0 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail

Top	(Type) Level Initial (0 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail

Top	(Type) Initial (0 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail

Top	(Type) Constant (5 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail
Estrangement Model FINAL	#15 C	Days in a week (Days/Week) = 7 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Maximum Contact Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#18 C	Hours spent with parent in a day (Hours/Days) = 6 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Maximum Contact Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#23 C	Normal Let Go Time (Week) = 2 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#24 C	Normal Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = 0.1 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Actual Probability of Contradiction Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#38 C	Week (Week) = 1 Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Change in Estrangement Change in Trust Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]

Top	(Type) Flow (5 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail
Estrangement Model FINAL	#2 F,A	Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#3 F,A	Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Estrangement Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#4 F,A	Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Trust Child Has in Parent Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#20 F,A	Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#32 F,A	Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]

Top	(Type) Auxiliary (17 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail
Estrangement Model FINAL	#1 A	Actual Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Normal Probability of Contradiction+Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#2 F,A	Change in Communication (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)>=1,1-Communication,IF THEN ELSE((Communication+Changes in Communication due to Estrangement)<=0,0-Communication,Changes in Communication due to Estrangement))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Communication As estrangement increases, the child sees lesser and lesser reason to invest effort into the relationship, and communication lessens. This process exhibits the behaviour of a balancing loop- the child sees that communication causes contradictions and thus responds by lowering communication to lower contradiction. With low levels of communication, the child effectively lowers his chances of experiencing more contradictions with his parent.However, lowering communication also lowers the chances of him letting go of past contradictions through constructive communication with his parent. This behaviour is reinforcing. Decreasing all communication decreases constructive communication, thus limiting the chances that the child will let go of past contradictions to depend on only his memory’s natural rate of forgetting them. Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 2  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#3 F,A	Change in Estrangement (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Estrangement+Changes in Estrangement due to Trust)>=1,1-Estrangement,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Estrangement due to Trust+Estrangement)<=0,0-Estrangement,Changes in Estrangement due to Trust))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Estrangement Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#4 F,A	Change in Trust (dmnl/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Trust Child Has in Parent+Changes in Trust due to Contradictions)>=1,1-Trust Child Has in Parent,IF THEN ELSE((Changes in Trust due to Contradictions+Trust Child Has in Parent)<=0,0-Trust Child Has in Parent,Changes in Trust due to Contradictions))/Week Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Trust Child Has in Parent Feedback Loops: 6 (66.7%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 3  [2,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#5 A	Changes in Communication due to Estrangement (dmnl) = Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Communication Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#7 A	Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (dmnl) = Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Estrangement Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [11,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#9 A	Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (dmnl) = Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup(Contradiction Actively Remembered) Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Change in Trust Feedback Loops: 5 (55.6%) (+) 3  [8,13] (-) 2  [11,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#12 A	Constructive Conversation (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Probability of Constructive Conversation Description: Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Letting go of contradiction ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Feedback Loops: 3 (33.3%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#13 A	Contradiction (Hours/Week) = Total Communication Time per Week*Actual Probability of Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Registering new contradictions Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#20 F,A	Letting go of contradiction (Hours/Week) = IF THEN ELSE((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time<((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)),Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time,((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Normal Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation)) Description: ((Contradiction Actively Remembered/Average Let Go Time)+Constructive Conversation) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 4 (44.4%) (+) 2  [8,13] (-) 2  [2,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#21 A	Maximum Contact Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Days in a week*Hours spent with parent in a day Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Total Communication Time per Week Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#25 A	Probability of Constructive Conversation (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback*Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#26 A	Probability of Contradiction (dmnl) = Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Actual Probability of Contradiction Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#28 A	Probability of Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup(Trust Child Has in Parent) Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Probability of Constructive Conversation Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 1  [8,8] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#30 A	Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback (dmnl) = Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup(Estrangement) Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Probability of Constructive Conversation Feedback Loops: 1 (11.1%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 1  [11,11]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#32 F,A	Registering new contradictions (Hours/Week) = Contradiction Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Contradiction Actively Remembered Where destructive communication happens, a child registers new contradictions in his memory. The total cumulation of contradictions remembered by the child may leave his memory in two ways- they are either gradually forgotten over time, or let go of through constructive communication. Letting go of contradiction thus increases the amount of trust a child has in his parent, while registering new contradictions in his memory decreases this amount of trust. Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [11,11] (-) 1  [13,13]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#36 A	Total Communication Time per Week (Hours/Week) = Maximum Contact Time per Week*Communication Present In 1 View: View 1 Used By Constructive Conversation Constructive conversation is one of the two ways in which a child can let go of contradictions. It is the ideal way in which contradictions should be resolved.In a situation of estrangement, constructive communication decreases as a result of the child decreasing all communication as a whole. As constructive communication decreases, the chances for the child to let go of past contradictions decrease. The child’s trust that his parent can change for the better and can be the parent that he needs then decreases, and levels of estrangement consequently increase, further decreasing communication and chances for constructive communication even more. Contradiction Feedback Loops: 2 (22.2%) (+) 1  [13,13] (-) 1  [13,13]

Top	(Type) Subscripts (0 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail

Top	(Type) Data (0 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail

Top	(Type) Game (0 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description	Thumbnail

Top	(Type) Lookup (6 Variables)
Group	Type	Variable Name And Description
Estrangement Model FINAL	#6 A,T	Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Changes in Communication due to Estrangement _RSSDlookup([(0,-0.01)-(1,0.01)],(0,0.01),(0.0448065,0.00933649),(0.0936864,0.00800948),(0.158859,0.00488152),(0.215886,0.00127962),(0.287169,-0.00298578),(0.368635,-0.00563981),(0.505092,-0.00800948),(0.653768,-0.00905213),(0.753564,-0.00952607),(1,-0.01) ) Description: !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Present In 0 Views: Used By Changes in Communication due to Estrangement !Estrangement!Changes in Communication due to Estrangemeent (1/Week) Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#8 A,T	Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Changes in Estrangement due to Trust _RSSDlookup([(0,-0.01)-(1,0.01)],(0,0.01),(0.132383,0.008863),(0.226069,0.00763),(0.313646,0.005735),(0.415479,0.002891),(0.501018,3.318e-05),(0.594705,-0.002891),(0.725051,-0.00630332),(0.837067,-0.008294),(0.906314,-0.009431),(1,-0.01) ) Description: !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Present In 0 Views: Used By Changes in Estrangement due to Trust !Trust!Changes in Estrangement due to Trust (1/Week) Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#10 A,T	Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Changes in Trust due to Contradictions _RSSDlookup([(0,-0.1)-(46,0.01)],(0,0.01),(2.90428,0.00900474),(6.1833,0.00331754),(9.93075,-0.00805687),(12.9287,-0.0218009),(15.5519,-0.0379621),(18.9246,-0.0609005),(21.9226,-0.076019),(26.0448,-0.0864455),(31.1976,-0.0921801),(39.3483,-0.0973934),(46,-0.1) ) Description: !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Present In 0 Views: Used By Changes in Trust due to Contradictions !Contradictions!Changes in Trust due to Contradictions (1/Week) Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#27 A,T	Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Probability of Contradiction _RSSDlookup([(0,0)-(1,1)],(0,0),(1,1) ) Description: !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Present In 0 Views: Used By Probability of Contradiction !Estrangement!Probability of Contradiction due to Estrangement (1/Hours) Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#29 A,T	Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Probability of Feedback _RSSDlookup([(0,0)-(1,1)],(0,0),(0.258656,0.0236967),(0.364562,0.0758294),(0.490835,0.208531),(0.596741,0.350711),(0.743381,0.587678),(1,1) ) Description: Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Present In 0 Views: Used By Probability of Feedback Overall, the more a child trusts his parent, the more willing he will be to give his parent constructive feedback. However, the less he trusts his parent, the more estrangement there will be between him and his parent. His parent’s willingness to accept feedback will depend on their relationship’s levels of estrangement. Constructive conversation to resolve contradictions is only possible with both the child being willing to give feedback, and his parent being willing to take it. With more constructive conversation, a child is more able to let go of contradiction, and gain more trust in his parent. Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]
Estrangement Model FINAL	#31 A,T	Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup (dmnl) Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback _RSSDlookup([(0,0)-(1,1)],(0,1),(0.311609,0.236967),(0.360489,0.137441),(0.417515,0.0521327),(0.5,0),(0.590631,0.028436),(0.676171,0.0853081),(0.767821,0.21327),(0.851324,0.398104),(0.916497,0.611374),(0.965377,0.810427),(1,1) ) Description: Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Present In 0 Views: Used By Probability of Parent Accepting Feedback Where estrangement between parent and child is non-existent, mutual trust is high and a parent is very willing to accept feedback. If estrangement is of an average amount, this means that the child has not let go of an amount of past contradictions inflicted in the relationship by his parent. Without a big enough reason to change, his parent is unlikely to be receptive to change. He is more likely to continue causing contradictions in his communication with his child, unaware of the future consequence of complete estrangement. Where estrangement finally reaches a high level, and the longer this high level of estrangement goes on for, the more inclined towards change the parent will be. This U-shaped relationship between Estrangement and the parent’s willingness to accept feedback is what makes their relationship either (-) or (+) in polarity in different circumstances. Feedback Loops: 0 (0.0%) (+) 0  [0,0] (-) 0  [0,0]

---

Variable Link Detail (30)

Supplementary Variables (0)

Supplementary Variables Being Used (0)

Unused Variables (0)

Non-Zero End Sloped Lookup Functions (6)

Cascading Lookup Functions (0)

Equations With Step Pulse Or Related Functions (0)

Equations With Min Or Max Functions (0)

Complex Variable (Richardson's Rule Threshold = 3) (0)

Complex Stock (0)

Variables With Source Information (0)

Function Sensitivity Parameters (0)

Data Lookup Tables (0)

Variables Not In Any View (0)

Equations With Unit Errors Or Warnings (1)

Units (4/3)

Feedback Loops (9|0 Maximum Length: 30 [2,13] | [0,0])

Macros (0)

Rate-to-rate Links (0)

View-Variable Profile

List Of 1 views and their 26 Variables